homotopy theory, (∞,1)-category theory, homotopy type theory
flavors: stable, equivariant, rational, p-adic, proper, geometric, cohesive, directed…
models: topological, simplicial, localic, …
see also algebraic topology
Introductions
Definitions
Paths and cylinders
Homotopy groups
Basic facts
Theorems
geometric representation theory
representation, 2-representation, ∞-representation
Grothendieck group, lambda-ring, symmetric function, formal group
principal bundle, torsor, vector bundle, Atiyah Lie algebroid
Eilenberg-Moore category, algebra over an operad, actegory, crossed module
Be?linson-Bernstein localization?
and
rational homotopy theory (equivariant, stable, parametrized, equivariant & stable, parametrized & stable)
Examples of Sullivan models in rational homotopy theory:
Let be a finite group (or more generally a compact Lie group).
Say that an equivariantly connected and nilpotent topological G-space (i.e. all fixed loci are connected and nilpotent, for , with a common bound of nilpotency as ranges) is rational if all its equivariant homotopy groups (for and ) admit the structure of rational vector spaces.
Given any topological G-space , a rationalization of is a morphism (a -equivariant continuous function)
to a rational -space which induces isomorphisms on all rationalized equivariant homotopy groups:
In other words, after regarding them, via Elmendorf's theorem, as (∞,1)-presheaves on the orbit category of , the equivariant homotopy types of rational -spaces and their rationalizations are equivalently stage-wise over plain rational spaces and rationalizations, respectively.
It follows from the fundamental theorem of dg-algebraic equivariant rational homotopy theory that, at least on equivariantly simply connected topological G-spaces, equivariant rationalization is given by the derived adjunction unit of the equivariant PL de Rham complex-Quillen adjunction.
Peter May, Section II.3 in: Equivariant homotopy and cohomology theory, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 91, Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC, 1996. With contributions by M. Cole, G. Comezana, S. Costenoble, A. D. Elmenddorf, J. P. C. Greenlees, L. G. Lewis, Jr., R. J. Piacenza, G. Triantafillou, and S. Waner. (ISBN: 978-0-8218-0319-6 pdf, pdf)
Georgia Triantafillou, Section 2.6 in Equivariant minimal models, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. vol 274 pp 509-532 (1982) (jstor:1999119)
Laura Scull, p. 11 of: A model category structure for equivariant algebraic models, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 360 (5), 2505-2525, 2008 (doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-07-04421-2)
Last revised on October 4, 2020 at 17:17:52. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.